From 14cbd545bfca253a1c4063685eff6535e41d0611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: oharboe <oharboe@b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:44:42 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] added item to come up with slick new 32 bit jtag_add_xxx()
 API

git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2548 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60
---
 TODO | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 795b2befb..2e87d5107 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -39,11 +39,16 @@ This section list issues that need to be resolved in the JTAG layer.
 
 @subsection thelistjtagcore JTAG Core
 
-The following tasks have been suggeted for cleaning up the JTAG layer:
+The following tasks have been suggested for cleaning up the JTAG layer:
 
 - use tap_set_state everywhere to allow logging TAP state transitions
 - rename other tap_states to use standard JTAG names (suggested by ML)
 - Encapsulate cmd_queue_cur_state and related varaible handling.
+- add slick 32 bit versions of jtag_add_xxx_scan() that avoids
+buf_set_u32() calls and other evidence of poor impedance match between
+API and calling code. New API should cut down # of lines in calling
+code by 100's and make things clearer. Also potentially be supported
+directly in minidriver API for better embedded host performance.
 
 The following tasks have been suggested for adding new core JTAG support:
 
-- 
GitLab